The hardness of God is kinder than the softness of man. His compulsion is my liberation.
27 May 2023
Excellent.
Elton John, "Philadelphia Freedom"
Nice.
Profound.
Flying.
Clear.
Deep.
Weber, Bassoon Concerto in F major, Op.75
Intoxicating.
26 May 2023
Stand.
Excellent.
Following rare access to the bell tower at Hull Minster in September 2021, this immersive electronic work is made entirely of recordings of the bells that have rung out over the city of Hull for centuries, and of the clock mechanism that has marked that time. With live spatialisation across 24 speakers set up around the magnificent Hull Minster, this music delves deep into the resonances of the place and plays with the rich acoustics of the building.Nightports is based on a simple rule of restriction: only sounds captured for a particular project can be used. Nothing else – no samples or synths or drum machines – though the sounds captured can be stretched, cut, morphed and twisted, ordered and reordered. All of the sounds of this performance come from Hull Minster. It is music in and of this special place.
25 May 2023
Working.
HAMILTONGeorgia, tell Andy about how you got your mountain. Remember when somebody was interviewing you, and you said, “That’s my mountain.” And they said, “What do you mean that’s your mountain?” You said, “God told me if I painted it enough he’d give it to me.” Isn’t that true?
O’KEEFFEAnd I’m still working on it.
Adventures.
Today is your day!Your mountain is waiting.So ... get on your way!Dr. Seuss
24 May 2023
Spectacular.
Casey, Gin and Tonic, 2016
Bond ordered a double gin and tonic and one whole green lime. When the drink came he cut the lime in half, dropped the two squeezed halves into the long glass, almost filled the glass with ice cubes and then poured in the tonic. He took the drink out on to the balcony, and sat and looked out across the spectacular view.
Ian Fleming
Orangery.
Jam.
Urgency.
An image which captures, perfectly, the urgency of life in the rare map trade: me, answering a customer enquiry after a good lunch. pic.twitter.com/zEKASDLstV
— Tim Bryars (@TimBryars) May 22, 2023
Beyond.
23 May 2023
22 May 2023
Be.
Happy Birthday, Cassatt
Bound.
Poet.
Arthur Rimbaud
Happy Birthday, Wagner
21 May 2023
Happy Birthday, Lynch
Warning.
Listening to them, you begin to understand what Nietzsche meant when he said the strong must be protected from the weak. The force of the whining is so overwhelming, the corresponding urge not to appear mean or unreasonable so great, that one is tempted to make humiliating concessions just to shut them up.
This year our school moved into a different building, one of the many benefits of this being access to eight pristinely-paved tennis courts for recess. In August, administration graciously provided equipment for pickleball, but the squibs quickly and intelligently abandoned the game, and instead began bringing their own tennis racquets (which they call "thundersticks") for jeu de paume. Skills are enthusiastically developing and interpretations are thriving. What a blast.
Ackroyd.
Turned.
Telemann, Overture Suite in in G major, "La Bizarre," TWV 55:G2
Significance.
To write history, or even to read it, is to be endlessly engaged in a process of selection. No part of the job is more difficult or more important, and yet no part has been studied with less system, or practiced with less method. Many facts are called, but few are consciously chosen, on explicit and rational criteria of factual significance.Historians have, I think, deliberately resisted the refinement and rationalization of this aspect of their task. For some of them, the idea of a chosen fact is hateful in itself. Others think that the process of selection is not merely an unknown but a mystery. Both of these beliefs are utterly mistaken. The process of selection can and must be clarified if history is to develop beyond its present condition. Criteria of factual significance can and must be specified, or else historians will be running through records like rats in a maze, without even a rudimentary notion of the nature of their predicament. In every historical inquiry, the process of factual selection operates in several separate ways. One species of selection, commonly called "sampling," consists in the selection of representative facts of a certain predetermined kind, within a closed universe of investigation. This undertaking, difficult as it often is in practice, presents comparatively few conceptual problems. We shall consider it in a later chapter. A much tougher problem is presented by the complex selection process that precedes sampling-namely, the selection of the kinds of facts to be sampled. This involves the determination of fundamental criteria offactual significance.Significance is the sort of word which sends shudders down the spine of every working historian. But if he turns his back upon the problem, he will operate upon covert criteria of factual significance, which may be incompatible with his own objectives. "He who is deficient in the art of selection," Macaulay wrote, "may, by showing nothing but the truth, produce the effect of the grossest falsehood." And he who is deficient in his ideas of significance is sure to be equally so in the art of selection.There are a few common fallacies in this respect, a few criteria of factual significance which are inconsistent with empiricism in history. In each of the following instances, the fallacy consists not in the criteria themselves but rather in an attempt to combine them with the methods and objects of empirical inquiry. Every historian, of course, has the inalienable right to do any kind of history that pleases him-a constitutional right to go wrong in his own way. But no historian is liberated from the logical consequences of his own assumptions. The object of this chapter is not to condemn certain deviations from narrow academic norms. It is rather to demonstrate that all historians operate upon certain criteria of factual significance in their work, and that those criteria must be aligned with their own purposes, and methods.
Perspectives.
A liberal education implies breadth and depth: basic knowledge in a range of disciplines, focused by more concentrated work in one. These goals are common to all liberal arts institutions, but at Brown they have a special context. Our open curriculum ensures you great freedom in directing the course of your education, but it also expects you to remain open—to people, ideas, and experiences that may be entirely new. By cultivating such openness, you will learn to make the most of the freedom you have, and to chart the broadest possible intellectual journey, not just during your first semesters but through your entire time at Brown.What does it mean to be broadly educated? The first Western universities conceived of the liberal arts as seven distinct modes of thought, three based on language (grammar, rhetoric, and logic), and four on number (arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy). While this structure has changed over the centuries, the basic concept has endured. A modern liberal arts education is still defined in terms of a core curriculum comprised of several areas of knowledge. At Brown, rather than specifying these areas, we challenge you to develop your own core. Over four years you will sample courses in the humanities, the social sciences, the life sciences, and the physical sciences. But the real challenge is to make connections between those courses, using the perspective gained from one discipline as a window onto the next. The most significant social, political, and moral issues of our time require the ability to think from multiple vantage points, and Brown’s curriculum affords you the opportunity to develop just this sort of nuanced perspective.
The liberal arts education has its roots in ancient history and the subjects deemed necessary for a citizen to take part in civic society. In the modern era, a liberal arts education stems from the belief that an interdisciplinary education prepares students for society through exposure to a breadth of academic disciplines while allowing for depth in a major area of study. Students need to be adaptable in a fast-paced, interconnected world; through a four-year discourse with peers, students will learn analysis, argument, quantitative reasoning, logical inference and creative thinking. Students are encouraged to ask critical questions; not just the how, but the why. Not only will this instill personal passions for students, but many employers rank skills such as working in a team structure, communication, decision making and problem solving, and obtaining and processing information very highly in job candidates. A true liberal arts education is achieved without concern for vocational utility, yet at the same time prepares students for the evolving world and job market within which we operate today.
A liberal arts education at Cornell will change the way you think, challenge your assumptions, and make you take a deeper look at the world around you. It will help you understand the foundations of knowledge, inquiry, and creativity, and prepare you for a lifetime of intellectual growth and adventure. Choice and flexibility are the hallmarks of the College of Arts and Sciences’ approach to providing a liberal arts education. As an undergraduate, you’ll have two years to choose a major, which will give you plenty of time to sample courses that intrigue you and expand your academic horizons. The college ensures that you receive broad exposure to important liberal arts disciplines through its distribution requirements in the humanities and arts, science and math, the social sciences, and language. In-depth study in a specific major field helps you develop and hone your reasoning and writing skills.
Freedom of expression and dissent is protected by Dartmouth regulations. Dartmouth prizes and defends the right of free speech and the freedom of the individual to make their own disclosures, while at the same time recognizing that such freedom exists in the context of the law and in responsibility for one's own actions. The exercise of these rights must not deny the same rights to any other individual. The institution therefore both fosters and protects the rights of individuals to express dissent.Protest or demonstration shall not be discouraged so long as neither force nor the threat of force is used, and so long as the orderly processes of the institution are not deliberately obstructed. Membership in the Dartmouth community carries with it, as a necessary condition, the agreement to honor and abide by this policy.
Commitment to liberal arts & sciences is at the core of Harvard College’s mission: before students can help change the world, they need to understand it. The liberal arts & sciences offer a broad intellectual foundation for the tools to think critically, reason analytically and write clearly. These proficiencies will prepare students to navigate the world’s most complex issues, and address future innovations with unforeseen challenges. Shaped by ideas encountered and created, these new modes of thinking will prepare students for leading meaningful lives, with conscientious global citizenship, to enhance the greater good.
A liberal arts education offers an expansive intellectual grounding in all kinds of humanistic inquiry.By exploring issues, ideas and methods across the humanities and the arts, and the natural and social sciences, you will learn to read critically, write cogently and think broadly. These skills will elevate your conversations in the classroom and strengthen your social and cultural analysis; they will cultivate the tools necessary to allow you to navigate the world’s most complex issues.
Yale is committed to the idea of a liberal arts education through which students think and learn across disciplines, liberating or freeing the mind to its fullest potential. The essence of such an education is not what you study, but the result: gaining the ability to think critically and independently and to write, reason, and communicate clearly – the foundation for all professions.
Indeed.
Unsettle.
I am an old-school humanist intellectual, and so I believe that the classroom is a place where you thoroughly unsettle people. You unnerve and unhouse them. I guess when the younger generation talks about safe spaces, they have in mind that they want to be respected. And I do think that we ought to respect each other’s perspectives, but at the same time if they feel that they don’t want their views to be violated, then I’m critical of that.Education is very much about the shaking of whatever convictions we have. You know what Nietzsche says: It’s not just the courage of having your convictions, it’s a matter of mustering the courage to attack your convictions, too. That doesn’t mean that you have to give them up in the end, but they need to be seriously scrutinized. So in that sense, safe space for me means respect for perspective, and then robust Socratic energy.
Rigorous.
Isn't it the case that, at least in the humanities and social sciences, the materials to be studied are fraught with political and ideological implications? How could those implications be ignored or removed without producing a classroom experience that would be arid and just plain dull? Easy. What you do is regard the political and ideological implications of your materials as something to be studied and not as something you and your students vote on. The master rule was given long ago by Max Weber when he insisted that while canvassing for votes and trying to persuade others to your partisan views is perfectly appropriate in the political arena, it is perfectly inappropriate in the classroom. "It is one thing," says Weber, "to determine...the internal structure of cultural values, while it is another thing to answer questions of the value of culture." I have coined an ugly word which, I think, captures Weber's understanding of what should and should not go on in higher education. The word is "academicize," and it is easily turned into a slogan on the model of Duke Professor Fredrick Jameson's famous advice to cultural critics--always historicize. My advice is always academicize, by which I mean always remove the materials you bring to the classroom from the context of their real-world urgency--where you ask and answer questions like what should we do now and which of the alternative courses of action is just and moral--and insert them into the context of academic urgencies--where you ask and answer questions like what is the structure of the arguments on either side of this issue or what are the historical antecedents of the present controversy or what is the relationship between this controversy and others now playing out in neighboring areas of inquiry? The more you ask this second kind of question, the less you and your students will ask, or even be interested in, the first kind. Academicizing a subject means draining it of the energies that animate partisan proponents of one position or another, and infusing it with the energies that come along with rigorous intellectual interrogation. And you can do this without losing the political significance of the subject; it's just that that significance becomes part of what is being studied rather an occasion for real-life decision making.
Martin Hackworth on the orthodoxy of the elites ...
The triumph of group-think over intellectual diversity has occurred to our considerable detriment. Our government is vastly incompetent and the progenitor of bad outcomes because political parties and the federal bureaucracy each rely on only their own corrals of acceptable thought. You may be incompetent (see Pete Buttigieg), you may be of any race, creed, or sexual orientation, you may even identify as a puppy and still get a seat at the table with the big kids, as long as you don’t object to the orthodoxy du jour. Do that, and you are out.


































