I just discovered that poet and Rumi scholar Coleman Barks passed in February.
The student reads The Master ...
A forest of things.
That the Founders fought their war anyway was admirable. That the leading voices of their era had the presence of mind to hijack the American revolution and to codify a set of radical principles into a national charter was even more so. Indeed, we might today learn a great deal from a political culture that, per Burke, preferred to detect “ill principle” not by “actual grievance” but instead to “judge of the pressure of the grievance by the badness of the principle” and to “augur misgovernment at a distance; and snuff the approach of tyranny in every tainted breeze.” And yet our celebration of their fortitude is rendered as folly if we forget that, for all that the rebels went through, they were not facing down evil in its purest form.Later, quoting President Lincoln..
That task would fall to other Americans — many of whom would pay a terrible price for their rebellions. Eventually, after a century-long struggle and a series of yo-yoing attempts, the twin horrors of slavery and segregation would indeed fall to posterity — but only after they had presented challenges that eclipsed those that were posed during the Revolution. The two eras are essentially incomparable. The crime of the British in America was to deny British conceptions of good government to a people who had become accustomed to it, and to do so capriciously. The crime of white supremacy in the South was, in the words of Ida B. Wells, to “cut off ears, toes, and fingers, strips off flesh, and distribute portions” of any person whom the majority disliked, and to do so in many cases as a matter of established public policy. When Paul Revere warned that “the regulars are coming,” he was alerting his neighbors against an invading force to which more than half the country felt it belonged; when a teenaged Rosa Parks conceded that she wanted to see her grandfather “kill a Ku-Kluxer,” she was fighting for her very survival.
For most of America’s story, an entire class of people was, as a matter of course, enslaved, beaten, lynched, subjected to the most egregious miscarriages of justice, and excluded either explicitly or practically from the body politic. We prefer today to reserve the word “tyranny” for its original target, King George III, or to apply it to foreign despots. But what other characterization can be reasonably applied to the governments that, ignoring the words of the Declaration of Independence, enacted and enforced the Fugitive Slave Act? How else can we see the men who crushed Reconstruction? How might we view the recalcitrant American South in the early 20th century? “It” did “happen here.”
But soberly, it is now no child’s play to save the principles of Jefferson from total overthrow in this nation.
One would start with great confidence that he could convince any sane child that the simpler propositions of Euclid are true; but, nevertheless, he would fail, utterly, with one who should deny the definitions and axioms. The principles of Jefferson are the definitions and axioms of free society.
And yet they are denied and evaded, with no small show of success.
One dashingly calls them “glittering generalities”; another bluntly calls them “self evident lies”; and still others insidiously argue that they apply only to “superior races.”
These expressions, differing in form, are identical in object and effect–the supplanting the principles of free government, and restoring those of classification, caste, and legitimacy. They would delight a convocation of crowned heads, plotting against the people. They are the vanguard–the miners, and sappers–of returning despotism.
We must repulse them, or they will subjugate us.
This is a world of compensations; and he who would be no slave, must consent to have no slave. Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves; and, under a just God, can not long retain it.
All honor to Jefferson–to the man who, in the concrete pressure of a struggle for national independence by a single people, had the coolness, forecast, and capacity to introduce into a merely revolutionary document, an abstract truth, applicable to all men and all times, and so to embalm it there, that to-day, and in all coming days, it shall be a rebuke and a stumbling-block to the very harbingers of re-appearing tyranny and oppression.
See also.
There is a way of losing that is finding. When soul over-masters sense. When the noble and divine self overcomes the lower self. When duty and honor and love immortal things bid the mortal perish. It is only when a man supremely gives that he supremely finds. In great deeds, something abides. On great fields, something stays. Forms change and pass; bodies disappear; but spirits linger, to consecrate ground for the vision-place of soul. Generations that know us not and that we know not of, heart-drawn to see where and by whom great things were suffered and done for them, shall come to this deathless field, to ponder and dream; and lo! The shadow of a mighty presence shall wrap them in its bosom, and the power of the vision pass into their souls.Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain, from his address to the 16th Maine Volunteers in Gardiner, Maine 1898
He’s excited about living in this oasis surrounded by the village. Prieto has fond memories of spending summers there as a child, playing in the wooded lot and watching his grandmother bang out one of her columns on an old, manual typewriter.“When she was typing, it sounded like machine-gun fire,” he said with a smile.He has big plans for the old place – to preserve as much as possible and return it to something close to its original look.That means shoring up several foundational elements of the house – a split beam or two among the dozen or so of the old tree trunks that hold up the first floor and pushing a sagging brick wall on the southwest corner back into position.While cutting down trees that had grown too close to the house, Prieto said he strategically left a large pine that he plans to use as a brace to push the front wall back into place – a wall made of bricks that were handmade on site 220 years ago.
It ought to be commemorated, as the Day of Deliverance by solemn Acts of Devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with Pomp and Parade, with Shews, Games, Sports, Guns, Bells, Bonfires and Illuminations from one End of this Continent to the other from this Time forward forever more.
There's not much chance that Adams could've expected our freedom to reach such heights as BÖC covering MC5 (Abigail might have), but he did ask for pomp, so Independence Week starts here and now as we, for the 250th time, "kick out the jams, brothers and sisters" ...
Toumey Nursery is one of eight locations managed by the USFS to provide seedlings and seeds for United States destinations both within and without Forest Service jurisdiction. The other growers are Ashe Seed Extractory in Mississippi, C. E. Bessey Nursery in Nebraska, Placerville Nursery in California, Lucky Peak Nursery and Coeur d’Alene Nursery in Idaho, and J. Herbert Stone Nursery and Bend Seed Extractory in Oregon.Six of the facilities are financed nurseries, while two are seed extractories. They serve to “provide locally adapted plants and seed for reforestation projects, provide an assured source of desirable species and stock types for restoring native ecosystems, and maintain the (USFS)’s position as a conservation leader,” states usda.gov.Toumey Nursery, in particular, has multiple services. In fields, 66 acres are available for planting. Species grown are primarily red pine, jack pine, white pine, spruces, tamarack, cedars, hemlock, oaks, maples and birches, according to their website. About 4 million seedlings are shipped out each year, and at full capacity, the fields may grow up to 12 million seedlings at a time. Trees are usually between 1 and 3 years old at time of relocation, depending on species.
Trees rule. So do birds. Birds in trees rule.
I fell in with the Marquis & had his company thus far. He presses me much to fall into his plan, and I am not sure that I shall decline it. It will carry me farther than I had proposed, but I shall be rewarded by the pleasure of his company and the further opportunity of gratifying my curiosity.
Kurt points to the fact that both men understood and practiced the fact that the health of the republic depended on the moral and intellectual qualities of the people who sustained it.
To be a bird among these men.
Whither leadership?

What grateful Off’ring shall we bring?What shall we render to the Lord?Loud Halleluiahs let us Sing,And praise his name on ev’ry Chord.
The increase in loud egos has coincided with declines in well-being. The rate of depression in the United States has risen to its highest level on record. Behavioral science offers a compelling thesis that may explain what we’re seeing, as a result of what has been termed the “self-reflection paradox.” An intense focus on self is an evolved trait, scientists suggest, because it confers competitive advantages in mating and survival. But research has also shown that to be so focused on self can be a primary source of unhappiness and maladjustment. So what appears to be happening is that we have developed culture and technology that together supercharge this primal drive of self-reflection—to such an unhealthy and unnatural extent that it has the paradoxical effect of ruining our lives.Where this grim trend will take our society I have no idea, but I do know that there are measures you can take to protect your well-being—short of checking out and moving to a Himalayan monastery. Unless that is actually what you want to do, then the secret to staying happy amid a culture of loud ego is to adopt for yourself the opposite strategy: cultivate a quiet ego.
As marketer and author Seth Godin reminds us, humility is key: “Having a point of view is different from always being correct. No one is always correct.” What I’m talking about here is a focused worldview—a cooked-down, concentrated version of your philosophy—not a catchy slogan. A point of view, to my point of view, is a deeply held, strongly believed-in perspective—a well-thought-out and well-articulated sense of what it is you do so differently from nearly any other business.How do you know it’s working? One way is that your organization is hitting its bottom lines. Another is that you refer to it—along with mission, vision, and guiding principles—when you make decisions. Tad Hargrave says, “One of the surest ways to know your point of view is solid is when people you share it with are visibly relieved. They were lost but now are found. They were blind but now can see.”A few weeks ago, I referenced the British painter Rose Wylie—now going on 92—who says clearly and directly, “Contrast gives life.” Contrast also offers context. And as Hargrave notes, “The world is drowning in content. What your clients crave is context.” What does he mean? Pick your industry—there’s no end to the examples. Every supermarket has olive oil now! And yet, below, I write about a newly arrived oil at the Deli. Does the world need it? No. Do I need it? No. But it’s REALLY good, and if I did my writing work reasonably well, you’ll understand why it’s so special and worth at least swinging by the Deli to taste. Having clarity on a point of view makes it infinitely easier to communicate what you care about—and why it matters to anyone other than your mother.
A time when the normal laws of nature or divinity could be suspended, when spirits and fairies could contact humans, when humans could exceed the usual limitations of their world.