"I am not one who was born in the custody of wisdom. I am one who is fond of olden times and intense in quest of the sacred knowing of the ancients." Gustave Courbet
Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts

13 June 2025

Finest.

It did not really matter what we expected from life, but rather what life expected from us. We needed to stop asking about the meaning of life, and instead to think of ourselves as those who were being questioned by life—daily and hourly. Our answer must consist, not in talk and meditation, but in right action and in right conduct. Life ultimately means taking the responsibility to find the right answer to its problems and to fulfill the tasks which it constantly sets for each individual.

Viktor E. Frankl, from Man's Search for Meaning

Execupundit
 has human beings behaving rightly, with dignity, respect, and decorum ...

26 March 2025

21 November 2024

Dignity.

From the January 6, 1970 episode of Firing Line, William F. Buckley Jr. discusses skepticism and disorder with Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen.  Every minute of this discussion is fascinating and hopeful, what a refreshing level of dignity displayed in the way both men disagreed. 

Don't miss the last few minutes, beginning at  48:13.

19 October 2024

Resentment.


Resentment can be transformed into a governing emotion and a social cause, and thereby gain release from the constraints that normally contain it. This happens when resentment loses the specificity of its target, and becomes directed to society as a whole. That, it seems to me, is what happens when left-wing movements take over. In such cases resentment ceases to be a response to another’s unmerited success and becomes instead an existential posture: the posture of the one whom the world has betrayed. Such a person does not seek to negotiate within existing structures, but to gain total power, so as to abolish the structures themselves. He will set himself against all forms of mediation, compromise and debate, and against the legal and moral norms that give a voice to the dissenter and sovereignty to the ordinary person. He will set about destroying the enemy, whom he will conceive in collective terms, as the class, group or race that hitherto controlled the world and which must now in turn be controlled. And all institutions that grant protection to that class or a voice in the political process will be targets for his destructive rage. That posture is, in my view, the core of a serious social disorder.

Sir Roger Scruton, from Fools, Frauds and Firebrands: Thinkers of the New Left

Relativism.


In argument about moral problems, relativism is the first refuge of the scoundrel.

29 June 2023

Respectful.

CHOMSKY: What seems to me a very, in a sense, terrifying aspect of our society and other societies is the equanimity and the detachment with which sane, reasonable, sensible people can observe such events. I think that’s more terrifying than the occasional Hitler or LeMay or other that crops up. These people would not be able to operate were it not for this apathy and equanimity, and therefore I think that it’s in some sense the sane and reasonable and tolerant people who share a very serious burden of guilt that they very easily throw on the shoulders of others who seem more extreme and more violent.

An example of the respectful clash of two very different ideas.

27 July 2022

Marked.


A marked characteristic of the Liberal in debate with the conservative is the tacit premise that debate is ridiculous.  Many people shrink from arguments over facts because facts are tedious, because they require a formal familiarity with the subject under discussion, and because they can be ideologically dislocative. Many Liberals accept their opinions, ideas, and evaluations as others accept revealed truths.

William F. Buckley Jr., from Up from Liberalism (1959)

19 July 2020

Liberal.

From 1993, William F. Buckley Jr. discusses the question "What is Liberal Education?" with Elizabeth T. Kennan, John Agresto, and Cornel West ...

18 April 2019

Reconstruction.


The president says it must be rebuilt more beautiful than before. What an arrogant man. And he says you must do it five years. It's impossible. When you begin such work, you can't tell it would be five, six, seven years. You don't know. And you must take the time, or you will do it badly.

Didier Ryner

For nearly nine centuries, Notre-Dame has stood at the epicenter of Paris, capital of France.The blaze struck much more than a place of worship. How much do you invest in a national treasure, that's owned not by the church but by the state. Who pays for the renovation; taxpayers, philanthropists, fund drives? What kind of renovation? Can the project meet that five-year deadline set by France's president? Our panel discusses the questions surrounding the reconstruction of Notre-Dame ...

16 March 2017

Talent.

Is talent enough?  Mitsuka Uchida begins the debate ...



... it continues HERE.

07 August 2016

Story.


There's a mutual simmering resentment between historians and re-enactors. It's not a war or a battle - the hackneyed terms used for any controversy in Gettysburg - but it is a tension over who should tell the story of the war and how.

Call it the eggheads versus the interlopers.

Like any good American feud, it includes perceived differences in class, propriety, work ethic and honor.

The professional historians are clearly the establishment, and the re-enactors the literally unwashed masses.

But it's not a black and white, blue and gray kind of spat. It gets complicated.